Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGSCX vs SMCFX
RGSCX vs SMCFX Comparison
Open Charts RGSCX vs SMCFX
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$23.79
Change-$0.11 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.06M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F2
Price$76.16
Change-$0.19 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.31B
RGSCX vs SMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSCX vs. SMCFX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSCX is a StrongBuy and SMCFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMCFX has more cash in the bank: 80.3B vs. RGSCX (44.1M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than SMCFX: RGSCX (1.46) vs SMCFX (0.83). RGSCX was incepted earlier than SMCFX: RGSCX (24 years) vs SMCFX (17 years). RGSCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than SMCFX (0.76). SMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (16.00). SMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: SMCFX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). SMCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.54 vs. RGSCX (-6.27). SMCFX return over 5 years is better than : 16.92 vs. RGSCX (-23.89).
| RGSCX | SMCFX | RGSCX / SMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 0.76 | 313% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 0.76 | 314% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.205 | 9.842 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.1M | 80.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 0.83 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.27 | 10.54 | -60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.05 | 22.44 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.89 | 16.92 | -141% |
| Returns for 10 years | -40.59 | 55.85 | -73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers