Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGSCX vs SMCFX
RGSCX vs SMCFX Comparison
Open Charts RGSCX vs SMCFX
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$23.91
Change+$0.13 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.91M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F2
Price$77.58
Change+$0.56 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.4B
RGSCX vs SMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSCX vs. SMCFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSCX is a Hold and SMCFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMCFX has more cash in the bank: 81.4B vs. RGSCX (43.9M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than SMCFX: RGSCX (1.45) vs SMCFX (0.81). RGSCX was incepted earlier than SMCFX: RGSCX (24 years) vs SMCFX (17 years). RGSCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than SMCFX (0.76). SMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (16.00). SMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: SMCFX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). SMCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.64 vs. RGSCX (-7.10). SMCFX return over 5 years is better than : 19.59 vs. RGSCX (-22.80).
| RGSCX | SMCFX | RGSCX / SMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 0.76 | 313% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 0.76 | 314% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.741 | 11.890 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.9M | 81.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 0.81 | 180% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.10 | 12.64 | -56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.65 | 37.66 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.80 | 19.59 | -116% |
| Returns for 10 years | -37.07 | 66.37 | -56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers