Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGSCX vs SMCFX
RGSCX vs SMCFX Comparison
Open Charts RGSCX vs SMCFX
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$24.32
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.3M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F2
Price$76.06
Change+$0.38 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.78B
RGSCX vs SMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSCX vs. SMCFX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSCX is a Hold and SMCFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMCFX has more cash in the bank: 79.8B vs. RGSCX (45.3M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than SMCFX: RGSCX (1.43) vs SMCFX (0.83). RGSCX was incepted earlier than SMCFX: RGSCX (23 years) vs SMCFX (17 years). RGSCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than SMCFX (0.76). SMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (16.00). SMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: SMCFX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). SMCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.11 vs. RGSCX (-3.85). SMCFX return over 5 years is better than : 21.38 vs. RGSCX (-18.03).
| RGSCX | SMCFX | RGSCX / SMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 0.76 | 313% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 0.76 | 314% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.571 | 9.698 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.3M | 79.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 0.83 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.85 | 10.11 | -38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.04 | 33.52 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.03 | 21.38 | -84% |
| Returns for 10 years | -39.71 | 54.28 | -73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement