Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGSCX vs SMCFX
RGSCX vs SMCFX Comparison
Open Charts RGSCX vs SMCFX
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$22.26
Change+$0.22 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.47M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F2
Price$80.43
Change+$0.58 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.31B
RGSCX vs SMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSCX vs. SMCFX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSCX is a Buy and SMCFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMCFX has more cash in the bank: 82.3B vs. RGSCX (38.5M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than SMCFX: RGSCX (1.56) vs SMCFX (0.78). RGSCX was incepted earlier than SMCFX: RGSCX (24 years) vs SMCFX (17 years). RGSCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than SMCFX (0.76). SMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (25.00). SMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: SMCFX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). SMCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.30 vs. RGSCX (-16.07). SMCFX return over 5 years is better than : 4.16 vs. RGSCX (-42.16).
| RGSCX | SMCFX | RGSCX / SMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 0.76 | 313% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 0.76 | 314% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.607 | 16.001 | -10% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.5M | 82.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 0.78 | 199% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.07 | 9.30 | -173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.52 | 37.19 | 12% |
| Returns for 5 years | -42.16 | 4.16 | -1,015% |
| Returns for 10 years | -41.25 | 79.05 | -52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement