Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGSCX vs SFCWX
RGSCX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts RGSCX vs SFCWX
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$22.57
Change-$0.05 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.79M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$76.52
Change-$0.15 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.1B
RGSCX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSCX vs. SFCWX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSCX is a Buy and SFCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 81.1B vs. RGSCX (40.8M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than SFCWX: RGSCX (1.49) vs SFCWX (0.90). RGSCX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: RGSCX (24 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). RGSCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). SFCWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (25.00). RGSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: RGSCX (2500) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.80 vs. RGSCX (-15.48). SFCWX return over 5 years is better than : 10.29 vs. RGSCX (-33.30).
| RGSCX | SFCWX | RGSCX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 0.65 | 366% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 0.65 | 368% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.759 | 11.143 | 7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.8M | 81.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 0.90 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.48 | 6.80 | -228% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.07 | 42.09 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.30 | 10.29 | -323% |
| Returns for 10 years | -41.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement