Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGSCX vs SCWFX
RGSCX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts RGSCX vs SCWFX
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$24.23
Change+$0.04 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.38M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F1
Price$71.94
Change+$0.41 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.12B
RGSCX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSCX vs. SCWFX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSCX is a Buy and SCWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 79.1B vs. RGSCX (45.4M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than SCWFX: RGSCX (1.43) vs SCWFX (0.55). RGSCX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: RGSCX (23 years) vs SCWFX (24 years). RGSCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.08). SCWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (16.00). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: SCWFX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.31 vs. RGSCX (-0.77). SCWFX return over 5 years is better than : 21.20 vs. RGSCX (-16.78).
| RGSCX | SCWFX | RGSCX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 1.08 | 220% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 1.08 | 221% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.170 | 8.563 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.4M | 79.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 0.55 | 261% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.77 | 10.31 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.17 | 34.85 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.78 | 21.20 | -79% |
| Returns for 10 years | -39.48 | 46.64 | -85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement