Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGSCX vs SCWFX
RGSCX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts RGSCX vs SCWFX
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$23.79
Change-$0.11 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.06M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F1
Price$72.65
Change-$0.18 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.31B
RGSCX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSCX vs. SCWFX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSCX is a StrongBuy and SCWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 80.3B vs. RGSCX (44.1M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than SCWFX: RGSCX (1.46) vs SCWFX (0.55). RGSCX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: RGSCX (24 years) vs SCWFX (24 years). RGSCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.08). SCWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (16.00). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: SCWFX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.19 vs. RGSCX (-6.27). SCWFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.88 vs. RGSCX (-23.89).
| RGSCX | SCWFX | RGSCX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 1.08 | 220% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 1.08 | 221% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.205 | 9.634 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.1M | 80.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 0.55 | 265% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.27 | 10.19 | -62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.05 | 21.55 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.89 | 14.88 | -160% |
| Returns for 10 years | -40.59 | 50.46 | -80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement