Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGSCX vs SCWFX
RGSCX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts RGSCX vs SCWFX
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$23.91
Change+$0.13 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.91M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F1
Price$73.99
Change+$0.53 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.4B
RGSCX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSCX vs. SCWFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSCX is a Hold and SCWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 81.4B vs. RGSCX (43.9M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than SCWFX: RGSCX (1.45) vs SCWFX (0.53). RGSCX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: RGSCX (24 years) vs SCWFX (25 years). RGSCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.08). SCWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (16.00). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: SCWFX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.29 vs. RGSCX (-7.10). SCWFX return over 5 years is better than : 17.50 vs. RGSCX (-22.80).
| RGSCX | SCWFX | RGSCX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 1.08 | 220% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 1.08 | 221% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.741 | 11.656 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.9M | 81.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 0.53 | 272% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.10 | 12.29 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.65 | 36.64 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.80 | 17.50 | -130% |
| Returns for 10 years | -37.07 | 60.59 | -61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement