Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGSCX vs RSLFX
RGSCX vs RSLFX Comparison
Open Charts RGSCX vs RSLFX
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$22.26
Change+$0.22 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.47M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R5
Price$82.14
Change+$0.59 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.31B
RGSCX vs RSLFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSCX vs. RSLFX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSCX is a Buy and RSLFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLFX has more cash in the bank: 82.3B vs. RGSCX (38.5M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than RSLFX: RGSCX (1.56) vs RSLFX (0.81). RGSCX was incepted earlier than RSLFX: RGSCX (24 years) vs RSLFX (24 years). RGSCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than RSLFX (0.70). RSLFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (25.00). RSLFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: RSLFX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). RSLFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.24 vs. RGSCX (-16.07). RSLFX return over 5 years is better than : 3.87 vs. RGSCX (-42.16).
| RGSCX | RSLFX | RGSCX / RSLFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 0.70 | 340% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 0.70 | 341% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.607 | 15.238 | -11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.5M | 82.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 0.81 | 192% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.07 | 9.24 | -174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.52 | 37.50 | 12% |
| Returns for 5 years | -42.16 | 3.87 | -1,091% |
| Returns for 10 years | -41.25 | 79.02 | -52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement