Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGSCX vs RSEBX
RGSCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts RGSCX vs RSEBX
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$22.16
Change-$0.22 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.64M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$71.20
Change-$1.31 (-1.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.78B
RGSCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSCX is a Buy and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 81.8B vs. RGSCX (39.6M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: RGSCX (1.52) vs RSEBX (0.22). RGSCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: RGSCX (24 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). RGSCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). RSEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (25.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: RSEBX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.02 vs. RGSCX (-14.87). RSEBX return over 5 years is better than : 4.76 vs. RGSCX (-36.80).
| RGSCX | RSEBX | RGSCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 1.45 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 1.45 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.089 | 11.542 | -1% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.6M | 81.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.52 | 0.22 | 679% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.87 | 7.02 | -212% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.88 | 29.26 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.80 | 4.76 | -772% |
| Returns for 10 years | -41.01 | 58.21 | -70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement