Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGSCX vs RSEBX
RGSCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts RGSCX vs RSEBX
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$22.26
Change+$0.22 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.47M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$74.93
Change+$0.54 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.31B
RGSCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSCX is a Buy and RSEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 82.3B vs. RGSCX (38.5M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: RGSCX (1.56) vs RSEBX (0.22). RGSCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: RGSCX (24 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). RGSCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). RSEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (25.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: RSEBX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.44 vs. RGSCX (-16.07). RSEBX return over 5 years is better than : -0.50 vs. RGSCX (-42.16).
| RGSCX | RSEBX | RGSCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 1.45 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 1.45 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.607 | 14.434 | -11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.5M | 82.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 0.22 | 707% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.07 | 8.44 | -190% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.52 | 34.78 | 13% |
| Returns for 5 years | -42.16 | -0.50 | 8,503% |
| Returns for 10 years | -41.25 | 64.63 | -64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement