Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGSCX vs RSEBX
RGSCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts RGSCX vs RSEBX
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$24.32
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.3M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$71.04
Change+$0.35 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.78B
RGSCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSCX is a Hold and RSEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 79.8B vs. RGSCX (45.3M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: RGSCX (1.43) vs RSEBX (0.23). RGSCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: RGSCX (23 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). RGSCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). RSEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (16.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: RSEBX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.34 vs. RGSCX (-3.85). RSEBX return over 5 years is better than : 16.78 vs. RGSCX (-18.03).
| RGSCX | RSEBX | RGSCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 1.45 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 1.45 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.571 | 9.281 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.3M | 79.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 0.23 | 615% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.85 | 9.34 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.04 | 31.03 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.03 | 16.78 | -107% |
| Returns for 10 years | -39.71 | 43.37 | -92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement