Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGSCX vs RSEBX
RGSCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts RGSCX vs RSEBX
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap C
Price$24.23
Change+$0.04 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.38M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$70.45
Change+$0.41 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.12B
RGSCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSCX is a Buy and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 79.1B vs. RGSCX (45.4M). RGSCX pays higher dividends than RSEBX: RGSCX (1.43) vs RSEBX (0.23). RGSCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: RGSCX (23 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). RGSCX (2.39) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). RSEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSCX (16.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSCX: RSEBX (250) vs RGSCX (2500). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.90 vs. RGSCX (-0.77). RSEBX return over 5 years is better than : 18.70 vs. RGSCX (-16.78).
| RGSCX | RSEBX | RGSCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 1.45 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.39 | 1.45 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.170 | 8.373 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.4M | 79.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 0.23 | 615% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.77 | 9.90 | -8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.17 | 33.34 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.78 | 18.70 | -90% |
| Returns for 10 years | -39.48 | 41.22 | -96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement