Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGSAX vs SMCFX
RGSAX vs SMCFX Comparison
Open Charts RGSAX vs SMCFX
Virtus KAR Global Small-Cap A
Price$35.35
Change+$0.02 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.3M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F2
Price$76.06
Change+$0.38 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.78B
RGSAX vs SMCFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGSAX vs. SMCFX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGSAX is a Hold and SMCFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMCFX has more cash in the bank: 79.8B vs. RGSAX (45.3M). RGSAX pays higher dividends than SMCFX: RGSAX (1.06) vs SMCFX (0.83). RGSAX was incepted earlier than SMCFX: RGSAX (23 years) vs SMCFX (17 years). RGSAX (1.60) is less costly to investors than SMCFX (0.76). SMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. RGSAX (16.00). SMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGSAX: SMCFX (250) vs RGSAX (2500). SMCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.11 vs. RGSAX (-0.22). SMCFX return over 5 years is better than : 21.38 vs. RGSAX (-1.66).
| RGSAX | SMCFX | RGSAX / SMCFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.76 | 211% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.76 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.004 | 9.698 | 93% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.3M | 79.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.83 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.22 | 10.11 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.69 | 33.52 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.66 | 21.38 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.32 | 54.28 | -37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement