RGS
Price
$18.91
Change
-$0.51 (-2.63%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:21 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
47.31M
TNL
Price
$58.00
Change
-$0.88 (-1.49%)
Updated
Aug 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.83B
72 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

RGS vs TNL

Header iconRGS vs TNL Comparison
Open Charts RGS vs TNLBanner chart's image
Regis
Price$18.91
Change-$0.51 (-2.63%)
Volume$262
Capitalization47.31M
Travel + Leisure
Price$58.00
Change-$0.88 (-1.49%)
Volume$5.54K
Capitalization3.83B
RGS vs TNL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RGS vs. TNL commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGS is a Buy and TNL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (RGS: $19.42 vs. TNL: $58.88)
Brand notoriety: RGS and TNL are both not notable
RGS represents the Personnel Services, while TNL is part of the Consumer Sundries industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RGS: 59% vs. TNL: 69%
Market capitalization -- RGS: $47.31M vs. TNL: $3.83B
RGS [@Personnel Services] is valued at $47.31M. TNL’s [@Consumer Sundries] market capitalization is $3.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $28.42B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $175.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $3B. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $16.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RGS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTNL’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • RGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TNL’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, TNL is a better buy in the long-term than RGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RGS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TNL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RGS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TNL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RGS is a better buy in the short-term than TNL.

Price Growth

RGS (@Personnel Services) experienced а +2.62% price change this week, while TNL (@Consumer Sundries) price change was +0.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was +0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.67%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +1.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

TNL is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Personnel Services (+0.36% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

@Consumer Sundries (+1.08% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TNL($3.83B) has a higher market cap than RGS($47.3M). TNL has higher P/E ratio than RGS: TNL (10.24) vs RGS (0.51). TNL YTD gains are higher at: 19.418 vs. RGS (-18.128). TNL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 898M vs. RGS (116M). TNL has more cash in the bank: 212M vs. RGS (13.3M). RGS has less debt than TNL: RGS (368M) vs TNL (5.59B). TNL has higher revenues than RGS: TNL (3.92B) vs RGS (199M).
RGSTNLRGS / TNL
Capitalization47.3M3.83B1%
EBITDA116M898M13%
Gain YTD-18.12819.418-93%
P/E Ratio0.5110.245%
Revenue199M3.92B5%
Total Cash13.3M212M6%
Total Debt368M5.59B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RGS vs TNL: Fundamental Ratings
RGS
TNL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5062
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10033
SMR RATING
1..100
73
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6443
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7319
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2421

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TNL's Valuation (19) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGS (81) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGS’s over the last 12 months.

TNL's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for RGS (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew significantly faster than RGS’s over the last 12 months.

TNL's SMR Rating (3) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as RGS (7) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew similarly to RGS’s over the last 12 months.

TNL's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as RGS (64) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew similarly to RGS’s over the last 12 months.

TNL's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGS (73) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RGSTNL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSBW38.440.19
+0.50%
FS Bancorp
KRP14.470.02
+0.14%
Kimbell Royalty Partners LP
MSA174.18-2.76
-1.56%
Mine Safety
CSXXY48.63-1.09
-2.20%
CAR GROUP LTD
EDAP1.24-0.05
-3.80%
EDAP TMS SA

RGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGS and TRIP have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGS and TRIP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGS
1D Price
Change %
RGS100%
-1.67%
TRIP - RGS
28%
Poorly correlated
+11.68%
BKNG - RGS
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
RCL - RGS
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TNL - RGS
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
CCL - RGS
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.21%
More

TNL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TNL has been closely correlated with CUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TNL jumps, then CUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TNL
1D Price
Change %
TNL100%
-0.36%
CUK - TNL
70%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
CCL - TNL
70%
Closely correlated
-2.21%
VIK - TNL
68%
Closely correlated
N/A
RCL - TNL
66%
Closely correlated
N/A
NCLH - TNL
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.92%
More