RGS
Price
$27.39
Change
-$0.67 (-2.39%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
67.94M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TNL
Price
$72.54
Change
-$0.09 (-0.12%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
4.67B
59 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

RGS vs TNL

Header iconRGS vs TNL Comparison
Open Charts RGS vs TNLBanner chart's image
Regis
Price$27.39
Change-$0.67 (-2.39%)
Volume$3.14K
Capitalization67.94M
Travel + Leisure
Price$72.54
Change-$0.09 (-0.12%)
Volume$305.91K
Capitalization4.67B
RGS vs TNL Comparison Chart in %
RGS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TNL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RGS vs. TNL commentary
Dec 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGS is a StrongBuy and TNL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 28, 2025
Stock price -- (RGS: $27.39 vs. TNL: $72.54)
Brand notoriety: RGS and TNL are both not notable
RGS represents the Personnel Services, while TNL is part of the Consumer Sundries industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RGS: 38% vs. TNL: 47%
Market capitalization -- RGS: $67.94M vs. TNL: $4.67B
RGS [@Personnel Services] is valued at $67.94M. TNL’s [@Consumer Sundries] market capitalization is $4.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $29.16B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $175.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.73B. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RGS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTNL’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • RGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TNL’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, TNL is a better buy in the long-term than RGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RGS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TNL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RGS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TNL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TNL is a better buy in the short-term than RGS.

Price Growth

RGS (@Personnel Services) experienced а -5.55% price change this week, while TNL (@Consumer Sundries) price change was +0.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -17.49%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

TNL is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Personnel Services (-0.93% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

@Consumer Sundries (+0.20% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TNL($4.67B) has a higher market cap than RGS($67.9M). TNL has higher P/E ratio than RGS: TNL (12.01) vs RGS (0.61). TNL YTD gains are higher at: 48.438 vs. RGS (15.472). TNL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 923M vs. RGS (29.4M). TNL has more cash in the bank: 240M vs. RGS (16.6M). RGS has less debt than TNL: RGS (345M) vs TNL (5.58B). TNL has higher revenues than RGS: TNL (3.97B) vs RGS (223M).
RGSTNLRGS / TNL
Capitalization67.9M4.67B1%
EBITDA29.4M923M3%
Gain YTD15.47248.43832%
P/E Ratio0.6112.015%
Revenue223M3.97B6%
Total Cash16.6M240M7%
Total Debt345M5.58B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RGS vs TNL: Fundamental Ratings
RGS
TNL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9437
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10033
SMR RATING
1..100
133
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5241
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6822
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TNL's Valuation (26) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGS (86) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGS’s over the last 12 months.

TNL's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for RGS (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew significantly faster than RGS’s over the last 12 months.

TNL's SMR Rating (3) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as RGS (13) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew similarly to RGS’s over the last 12 months.

TNL's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as RGS (52) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew similarly to RGS’s over the last 12 months.

TNL's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGS (68) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that TNL’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RGSTNL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RGS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TNL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPOFF0.260.03
+13.52%
EARTHLABS INC.
AGGZF16.99N/A
N/A
AG Growth International Inc.
KGTFY16.70N/A
N/A
Krung Thai Bank Public Co., Ltd.
KPTCY7.26N/A
N/A
Kansai Paint Co., Ltd.
FCELB352.50-0.60
-0.17%
FuelCell Energy, Inc.

RGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGS and TRIP have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGS and TRIP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGS
1D Price
Change %
RGS100%
-2.38%
TRIP - RGS
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
BKNG - RGS
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
CSV - RGS
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
RCL - RGS
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.87%
TNL - RGS
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
More

TNL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TNL has been closely correlated with CCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TNL jumps, then CCL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TNL
1D Price
Change %
TNL100%
-0.12%
CCL - TNL
67%
Closely correlated
-1.76%
CUK - TNL
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.77%
RCL - TNL
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.87%
VIK - TNL
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
NCLH - TNL
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.55%
More