Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGNBX vs WSBFX
RGNBX vs WSBFX Comparison
Open Charts RGNBX vs WSBFX
American Funds Growth and Inc Port R2
Price$22.20
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.95B
Boston Trust Walden Balanced
Price$22.99
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets149.89M
RGNBX vs WSBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGNBX vs. WSBFX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGNBX is a Hold and WSBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGNBX has more cash in the bank: 21.9B vs. WSBFX (150M). WSBFX pays higher dividends than RGNBX: WSBFX (1.21) vs RGNBX (0.93). RGNBX was incepted earlier than WSBFX: RGNBX (14 years) vs WSBFX (27 years). RGNBX (1.40) is less costly to investors than WSBFX (0.95). RGNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. WSBFX (3.30). RGNBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSBFX: RGNBX (250) vs WSBFX (100000). RGNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.01 vs. WSBFX (1.68). RGNBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.94 vs. WSBFX (10.52).
| RGNBX | WSBFX | RGNBX / WSBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.95 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.95 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.225 | 3.187 | 572% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.9B | 150M | 14,600% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.21 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.01 | 1.68 | 774% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.53 | 12.34 | 369% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.94 | 10.52 | 342% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.94 | 66.71 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers