RGLSF
Price
$2.48
Change
-$0.08 (-3.12%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
308.07M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UAMY
Price
$7.18
Change
-$0.44 (-5.77%)
Updated
Nov 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.06B
144 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

RGLSF vs UAMY

Header iconRGLSF vs UAMY Comparison
Open Charts RGLSF vs UAMYBanner chart's image
Regulus Resources
Price$2.48
Change-$0.08 (-3.12%)
Volume$1.43K
Capitalization308.07M
United States Antimony
Price$7.18
Change-$0.44 (-5.77%)
Volume$81.97K
Capitalization1.06B
RGLSF vs UAMY Comparison Chart in %
RGLSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UAMY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RGLSF vs. UAMY commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGLSF is a StrongBuy and UAMY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (RGLSF: $2.56 vs. UAMY: $7.62)
Brand notoriety: RGLSF and UAMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RGLSF: 34% vs. UAMY: 68%
Market capitalization -- RGLSF: $308.07M vs. UAMY: $1.01B
RGLSF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $308.07M. UAMY’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RGLSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUAMY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RGLSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UAMY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both RGLSF and UAMY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RGLSF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UAMY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RGLSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UAMY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RGLSF is a better buy in the short-term than UAMY.

Price Growth

RGLSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +15.06% price change this week, while UAMY (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +19.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +167.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

UAMY is expected to report earnings on Apr 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.70% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UAMY($1.06B) has a higher market cap than RGLSF($308M). UAMY YTD gains are higher at: 330.508 vs. RGLSF (92.481). UAMY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -180.63K vs. RGLSF (-4.23M). RGLSF has more cash in the bank: 9.31M vs. UAMY (6.97M). UAMY has higher revenues than RGLSF: UAMY (25.7M) vs RGLSF (0).
RGLSFUAMYRGLSF / UAMY
Capitalization308M1.06B29%
EBITDA-4.23M-180.63K2,340%
Gain YTD92.481330.50828%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue025.7M-
Total Cash9.31M6.97M134%
Total DebtN/A973K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RGLSF vs UAMY: Fundamental Ratings
RGLSF
UAMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2779
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2059
SMR RATING
1..100
9392
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3834
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
666
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3475

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGLSF's Valuation (74) in the null industry is in the same range as UAMY (96) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that RGLSF’s stock grew similarly to UAMY’s over the last 12 months.

RGLSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UAMY (59) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that RGLSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UAMY’s over the last 12 months.

UAMY's SMR Rating (92) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as RGLSF (93) in the null industry. This means that UAMY’s stock grew similarly to RGLSF’s over the last 12 months.

UAMY's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as RGLSF (38) in the null industry. This means that UAMY’s stock grew similarly to RGLSF’s over the last 12 months.

UAMY's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Metal Fabrication industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGLSF (66) in the null industry. This means that UAMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGLSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RGLSFUAMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RGLSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UAMY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRWIX46.430.31
+0.67%
AMG Boston Common Global Impact I
CSXAX57.330.17
+0.30%
Calvert US Large Cap Core Rspnb Idx A
TLACX12.960.02
+0.15%
Transamerica Large Core ESG A
QGBLX11.21-0.01
-0.09%
Quantified Global Fund Investor
POSAX9.07-0.04
-0.44%
Principal Global Real Estate Sec A

UAMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UAMY has been loosely correlated with NB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UAMY jumps, then NB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UAMY
1D Price
Change %
UAMY100%
-5.58%
NB - UAMY
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.68%
MP - UAMY
41%
Loosely correlated
-3.60%
LGO - UAMY
39%
Loosely correlated
-3.51%
NAK - UAMY
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
RGLSF - UAMY
31%
Poorly correlated
+10.82%
More