RGLSF
Price
$1.60
Change
-$0.01 (-0.62%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
133.61M
TKRFF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
42.8M
Ad is loading...

RGLSF vs TKRFF

Header iconRGLSF vs TKRFF Comparison
Open Charts RGLSF vs TKRFFBanner chart's image
Regulus Resources
Price$1.60
Change-$0.01 (-0.62%)
Volume$2.44K
Capitalization133.61M
Tinka Resources
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$29.69K
Capitalization42.8M
RGLSF vs TKRFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RGLSF vs. TKRFF commentary
Jan 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGLSF is a Hold and TKRFF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 23, 2025
Stock price -- (RGLSF: $1.60 vs. TKRFF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: RGLSF and TKRFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RGLSF: 61% vs. TKRFF: 110%
Market capitalization -- RGLSF: $133.61M vs. TKRFF: $42.8M
RGLSF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $133.61M. TKRFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $42.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RGLSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTKRFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RGLSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TKRFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RGLSF is a better buy in the long-term than TKRFF.

Price Growth

RGLSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -2.82% price change this week, while TKRFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.44% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGLSF($134M) has a higher market cap than TKRFF($42.8M). RGLSF YTD gains are higher at: 20.564 vs. TKRFF (-14.286). TKRFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.21M vs. RGLSF (-2.57M). RGLSF has more cash in the bank: 16.5M vs. TKRFF (11.9M). RGLSF (0) and TKRFF (0) have equivalent revenues.
RGLSFTKRFFRGLSF / TKRFF
Capitalization134M42.8M313%
EBITDA-2.57M-2.21M116%
Gain YTD20.564-14.286-144%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash16.5M11.9M139%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RGLSF vs TKRFF: Fundamental Ratings
RGLSF
TKRFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2128
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
36100
SMR RATING
1..100
9190
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3788
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8086
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TKRFF's Valuation (64) in the null industry is in the same range as RGLSF (72). This means that TKRFF’s stock grew similarly to RGLSF’s over the last 12 months.

RGLSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TKRFF (100). This means that RGLSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TKRFF’s over the last 12 months.

TKRFF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as RGLSF (91). This means that TKRFF’s stock grew similarly to RGLSF’s over the last 12 months.

RGLSF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TKRFF (88). This means that RGLSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TKRFF’s over the last 12 months.

RGLSF's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as TKRFF (86). This means that RGLSF’s stock grew similarly to TKRFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X106146.2660004129.601600
+4.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY603.055.47
+0.92%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME27.47-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp
TSLA424.07-2.43
-0.57%
Tesla
AAPL222.64-7.34
-3.19%
Apple

RGLSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGLSF has been loosely correlated with ETRUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RGLSF jumps, then ETRUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGLSF
1D Price
Change %
RGLSF100%
N/A
ETRUF - RGLSF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TKRFF - RGLSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RKMSF - RGLSF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
REZZF - RGLSF
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.70%
RCKTF - RGLSF
6%
Poorly correlated
-14.53%
More

TKRFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TKRFF and MKNGF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TKRFF and MKNGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TKRFF
1D Price
Change %
TKRFF100%
N/A
MKNGF - TKRFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHTLF - TKRFF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RGLSF - TKRFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LMSQF - TKRFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.76%
TIGCF - TKRFF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.51%
More