RGLSF
Price
$1.76
Change
-$0.01 (-0.56%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
133.61M
RKMSF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Capitalization
9.85M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RGLSF vs RKMSF

Header iconRGLSF vs RKMSF Comparison
Open Charts RGLSF vs RKMSFBanner chart's image
Regulus Resources
Price$1.76
Change-$0.01 (-0.56%)
Volume$3.11K
Capitalization133.61M
Rokmaster Resources
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$12.15K
Capitalization9.85M
RGLSF vs RKMSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RGLSF vs. RKMSF commentary
Jun 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGLSF is a Hold and RKMSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 16, 2025
Stock price -- (RGLSF: $1.76 vs. RKMSF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: RGLSF and RKMSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RGLSF: 54% vs. RKMSF: 83%
Market capitalization -- RGLSF: $133.61M vs. RKMSF: $9.85M
RGLSF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $133.61M. RKMSF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $9.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RGLSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRKMSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RGLSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RKMSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both RGLSF and RKMSF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

RGLSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +0.63% price change this week, while RKMSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +9.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.32% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGLSF($134M) has a higher market cap than RKMSF($9.85M). RKMSF YTD gains are higher at: 55.651 vs. RGLSF (32.406). RGLSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.57M vs. RKMSF (-5.73M). RGLSF has more cash in the bank: 16.5M vs. RKMSF (357K). RGLSF (0) and RKMSF (0) have equivalent revenues.
RGLSFRKMSFRGLSF / RKMSF
Capitalization134M9.85M1,360%
EBITDA-2.57M-5.73M45%
Gain YTD32.40655.65158%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash16.5M357K4,622%
Total DebtN/A212K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RGLSF vs RKMSF: Fundamental Ratings
RGLSF
RKMSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26100
SMR RATING
1..100
91100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3837
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
73100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RKMSF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGLSF (70). This means that RKMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGLSF’s over the last 12 months.

RGLSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RKMSF (100). This means that RGLSF’s stock grew significantly faster than RKMSF’s over the last 12 months.

RGLSF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as RKMSF (100). This means that RGLSF’s stock grew similarly to RKMSF’s over the last 12 months.

RKMSF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as RGLSF (38). This means that RKMSF’s stock grew similarly to RGLSF’s over the last 12 months.

RGLSF's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as RKMSF (100). This means that RGLSF’s stock grew similarly to RKMSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FEBCX14.82-0.07
-0.47%
First Eagle Global Income Builder C
FCAEX12.27-0.18
-1.45%
Fidelity Climate Action
BRGIX108.11-1.68
-1.53%
Bridges Investment Fund
ESEAX32.76-0.51
-1.53%
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital Sel Eq A
OGLCX77.27-1.32
-1.68%
Invesco Global C

RGLSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGLSF has been loosely correlated with ETRUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RGLSF jumps, then ETRUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGLSF
1D Price
Change %
RGLSF100%
-0.51%
ETRUF - RGLSF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TKRFF - RGLSF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.87%
RKMSF - RGLSF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RCKTF - RGLSF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QZMRF - RGLSF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
More

RKMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RKMSF and BRYGF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RKMSF and BRYGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RKMSF
1D Price
Change %
RKMSF100%
N/A
BRYGF - RKMSF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KOGMF - RKMSF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
VMXXF - RKMSF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QZMRF - RKMSF
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.85%
QMCQF - RKMSF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.91%
More