RGLS vs SLNCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGLS is a StrongBuy and SLNCF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RGLS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLNCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- RGLS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SLNCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RGLS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- RGLS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
RGLS (@Biotechnology) experienced а +1.35% price change this week, while SLNCF (@Biotechnology) price change was -4.84% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.23%.
Reported Earning Dates
RGLS is expected to report earnings on Mar 20, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Biotechnology (-2.07% weekly)Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
| RGLS | SLNCF | RGLS / SLNCF | |
| Capitalization | 98.3M | 772M | 13% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.188 | 266.667 | 6% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 2.58M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 1.41M | N/A | - |
RGLS | SLNCF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 21 Undervalued | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 85 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RGLS's Valuation (21) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLNCF (56) in the null industry. This means that RGLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLNCF’s over the last 12 months.
SLNCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as RGLS (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that SLNCF’s stock grew similarly to RGLS’s over the last 12 months.
RGLS's SMR Rating (98) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as SLNCF (100) in the null industry. This means that RGLS’s stock grew similarly to SLNCF’s over the last 12 months.
SLNCF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as RGLS (60) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that SLNCF’s stock grew similarly to RGLS’s over the last 12 months.
SLNCF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RGLS (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that SLNCF’s stock grew similarly to RGLS’s over the last 12 months.
| RGLS | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% |
RGLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RGLS and NAUT have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGLS and NAUT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RGLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RGLS | 100% | N/A | ||
| NAUT - RGLS | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.40% | ||
| SPRY - RGLS | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.21% | ||
| SLNCF - RGLS | 25% Poorly correlated | -5.01% | ||
| CYDY - RGLS | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.92% | ||
| BBIO - RGLS | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.74% | ||
More | ||||
SLNCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SLNCF and RGLS have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLNCF and RGLS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLNCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLNCF | 100% | -5.01% | ||
| RGLS - SLNCF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NAMS - SLNCF | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.50% | ||
| SANA - SLNCF | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.63% | ||
| QLGN - SLNCF | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.46% | ||
| APGE - SLNCF | 21% Poorly correlated | -3.38% | ||
More | ||||