RGLD
Price
$265.17
Change
+$72.44 (+37.59%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
21.9B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STLRF
Price
$1.11
Change
+$0.01 (+0.91%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
165.2M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

RGLD vs STLRF

Header iconRGLD vs STLRF Comparison
Open Charts RGLD vs STLRFBanner chart's image
Royal Gold
Price$265.17
Change+$72.44 (+37.59%)
Volume$1.18M
Capitalization21.9B
STLLR GOLD
Price$1.11
Change+$0.01 (+0.91%)
Volume$61.25K
Capitalization165.2M
RGLD vs STLRF Comparison Chart in %
RGLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STLRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RGLD vs. STLRF commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGLD is a Buy and STLRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (RGLD: $265.17 vs. STLRF: $1.11)
Brand notoriety: RGLD and STLRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RGLD: 118% vs. STLRF: 72%
Market capitalization -- RGLD: $22.38B vs. STLRF: $170.26M
RGLD [@Precious Metals] is valued at $22.38B. STLRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $170.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $146.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RGLD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSTLRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RGLD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • STLRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RGLD is a better buy in the long-term than STLRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RGLD’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STLRF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RGLD’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • STLRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RGLD is a better buy in the short-term than STLRF.

Price Growth

RGLD (@Precious Metals) experienced а -9.72% price change this week, while STLRF (@Precious Metals) price change was -10.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +8.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +19.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +96.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

RGLD is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+8.13% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGLD($21.9B) has a higher market cap than STLRF($165M). RGLD has higher P/E ratio than STLRF: RGLD (35.64) vs STLRF (1.11). RGLD YTD gains are higher at: 16.971 vs. STLRF (-8.397). RGLD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 705M vs. STLRF (-31.25M). STLRF has less debt than RGLD: STLRF (1.22M) vs RGLD (770M). RGLD has higher revenues than STLRF: RGLD (858M) vs STLRF (0).
RGLDSTLRFRGLD / STLRF
Capitalization21.9B165M13,273%
EBITDA705M-31.25M-2,256%
Gain YTD16.971-8.397-202%
P/E Ratio35.641.113,218%
Revenue858M0-
Total CashN/A11.5M-
Total Debt770M1.22M63,167%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RGLD vs STLRF: Fundamental Ratings
RGLD
STLRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2113
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
15100
SMR RATING
1..100
5496
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3739
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4143
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7527

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGLD's Valuation (20) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as STLRF (39) in the null industry. This means that RGLD’s stock grew similarly to STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

RGLD's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for STLRF (100) in the null industry. This means that RGLD’s stock grew significantly faster than STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

RGLD's SMR Rating (54) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STLRF (96) in the null industry. This means that RGLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

RGLD's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as STLRF (39) in the null industry. This means that RGLD’s stock grew similarly to STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

RGLD's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as STLRF (43) in the null industry. This means that RGLD’s stock grew similarly to STLRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RGLDSTLRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RGLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STLRF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DVXC29.710.68
+2.36%
WEBs Communication Svcs XLC Dfnd Vol ETF
BIBL48.120.33
+0.69%
Inspire 100 ETF
FTSL45.570.15
+0.33%
First Trust Senior Loan ETF
FNGD5.72N/A
N/A
MicroSectors™ FANG+™ -3X Invrs Lvrgd ETN
JHAC14.92-0.11
-0.71%
JHancock Fundamental All Cap Core ETF

RGLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGLD has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RGLD jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGLD
1D Price
Change %
RGLD100%
-1.46%
WPM - RGLD
81%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
AEM - RGLD
81%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
GOLD - RGLD
80%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
FNV - RGLD
76%
Closely correlated
-0.58%
AGI - RGLD
76%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
More

STLRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STLRF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STLRF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STLRF
1D Price
Change %
STLRF100%
-5.26%
PAAS - STLRF
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.78%
AGI - STLRF
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
AU - STLRF
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.13%
SAND - STLRF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RGLD - STLRF
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
More