RGLD
Price
$265.17
Change
+$72.44 (+37.59%)
Updated
Feb 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
21.9B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RVLGF
Price
$0.50
Change
-$0.02 (-3.85%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
155.86M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

RGLD vs RVLGF

Header iconRGLD vs RVLGF Comparison
Open Charts RGLD vs RVLGFBanner chart's image
Royal Gold
Price$265.17
Change+$72.44 (+37.59%)
Volume$162.96K
Capitalization21.9B
Revival Gold
Price$0.50
Change-$0.02 (-3.85%)
Volume$242.94K
Capitalization155.86M
RGLD vs RVLGF Comparison Chart in %
RGLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RVLGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RGLD vs. RVLGF commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGLD is a Buy and RVLGF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (RGLD: $259.46 vs. RVLGF: $0.57)
Brand notoriety: RGLD and RVLGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RGLD: 129% vs. RVLGF: 63%
Market capitalization -- RGLD: $21.9B vs. RVLGF: $155.86M
RGLD [@Precious Metals] is valued at $21.9B. RVLGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $155.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $138.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RGLD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRVLGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RGLD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RVLGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RGLD is a better buy in the long-term than RVLGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RGLD’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RVLGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RGLD’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RVLGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RVLGF is a better buy in the short-term than RGLD.

Price Growth

RGLD (@Precious Metals) experienced а -10.66% price change this week, while RVLGF (@Precious Metals) price change was -7.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +22.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +98.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

RGLD is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.91% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGLD($21.9B) has a higher market cap than RVLGF($156M). RGLD YTD gains are higher at: 16.971 vs. RVLGF (12.280). RGLD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 705M vs. RVLGF (-10.96M). RGLD has higher revenues than RVLGF: RGLD (858M) vs RVLGF (0).
RGLDRVLGFRGLD / RVLGF
Capitalization21.9B156M14,038%
EBITDA705M-10.96M-6,431%
Gain YTD16.97112.280138%
P/E Ratio35.64N/A-
Revenue858M0-
Total CashN/A24.6M-
Total Debt770MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RGLD vs RVLGF: Fundamental Ratings
RGLD
RVLGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2115
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
15100
SMR RATING
1..100
5496
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3737
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
41100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGLD's Valuation (20) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RVLGF (58) in the null industry. This means that RGLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than RVLGF’s over the last 12 months.

RGLD's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for RVLGF (100) in the null industry. This means that RGLD’s stock grew significantly faster than RVLGF’s over the last 12 months.

RGLD's SMR Rating (54) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RVLGF (96) in the null industry. This means that RGLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than RVLGF’s over the last 12 months.

RGLD's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as RVLGF (37) in the null industry. This means that RGLD’s stock grew similarly to RVLGF’s over the last 12 months.

RGLD's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RVLGF (100) in the null industry. This means that RGLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than RVLGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RGLDRVLGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RGLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RVLGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NSANF2.380.08
+3.48%
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.
AXAHY46.210.47
+1.03%
AXA
YNAJF2.07N/A
N/A
Yantai North Andre Juice Co., Ltd.
CATWF0.07N/A
N/A
China Tontine Wines Group Ltd.
LHYFF4.72N/A
N/A
LHYFE S A

RGLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGLD has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RGLD jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGLD
1D Price
Change %
RGLD100%
-1.46%
WPM - RGLD
81%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
AEM - RGLD
81%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
GOLD - RGLD
80%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
FNV - RGLD
76%
Closely correlated
-0.58%
AGI - RGLD
76%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
More

RVLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RVLGF and WPM have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RVLGF and WPM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RVLGF
1D Price
Change %
RVLGF100%
-1.12%
WPM - RVLGF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
SA - RVLGF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
TORXF - RVLGF
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.07%
AGI - RVLGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
RGLD - RVLGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
More