Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs WSACX
RGEBX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs WSACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$77.54
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Wellington Shields All-Cap Instl
Price$33.29
Change-$0.06 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.84M
RGEBX vs WSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. WSACX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Hold and WSACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. WSACX (69.8M). WSACX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: WSACX (0.01) vs RGEBX (0.00). RGEBX was incepted earlier than WSACX: RGEBX (11 years) vs WSACX (31 years). WSACX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). WSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.77 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: RGEBX (250) vs WSACX (5000). WSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.68 vs. RGEBX (5.34). WSACX return over 5 years is better than : 31.61 vs. RGEBX (19.19).
| RGEBX | WSACX | RGEBX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.34 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.34 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.539 | 19.878 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 69.8M | 485,673% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.34 | 16.68 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.50 | 53.18 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.19 | 31.61 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.00 | 48.03 | 181% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement