Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs WSACX
RGEBX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs WSACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$83.95
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Wellington Shields All-Cap Instl
Price$32.32
Change-$0.02 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.71M
RGEBX vs WSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. WSACX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Hold and WSACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. WSACX (67.7M). WSACX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: WSACX (0.06) vs RGEBX (0.00). RGEBX was incepted earlier than WSACX: RGEBX (11 years) vs WSACX (31 years). WSACX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). WSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.77 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: RGEBX (250) vs WSACX (5000). WSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.76 vs. RGEBX (10.77). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.57 vs. WSACX (29.95).
| RGEBX | WSACX | RGEBX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.34 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.34 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.511 | 16.385 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 67.7M | 497,784% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.77 | 12.76 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.56 | 38.37 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.57 | 29.95 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.27 | 39.97 | 231% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement