Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs WSACX
RGEBX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs WSACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$75.85
Change-$9.36 (-10.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Wellington Shields All-Cap Instl
Price$34.09
Change+$1.54 (+4.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.48M
RGEBX vs WSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. WSACX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Hold and WSACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. WSACX (71.5M). RGEBX (0.00) and WSACX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGEBX was incepted earlier than WSACX: RGEBX (11 years) vs WSACX (31 years). WSACX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). WSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.77 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: RGEBX (250) vs WSACX (5000). WSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.29 vs. RGEBX (1.80). WSACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.14 vs. RGEBX (9.88).
| RGEBX | WSACX | RGEBX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.34 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.34 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.057 | 4.092 | -26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 71.5M | 469,930% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.80 | 18.29 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.63 | 55.93 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.88 | 30.14 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.02 | 69.97 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement