Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs WMKGX
RGEBX vs WMKGX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs WMKGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$83.30
Change-$1.87 (-2.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
WesMark Large Company Fund
Price$26.38
Change-$0.57 (-2.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets368.71M
RGEBX vs WMKGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. WMKGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Buy and WMKGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. WMKGX (369M). WMKGX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: WMKGX (0.07) vs RGEBX (0.00). RGEBX was incepted earlier than WMKGX: RGEBX (11 years) vs WMKGX (29 years). WMKGX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WMKGX (16.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMKGX: RGEBX (250) vs WMKGX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.10 vs. WMKGX (2.92). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.65 vs. WMKGX (13.69).
| RGEBX | WMKGX | RGEBX / WMKGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.16 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.16 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.219 | 17.330 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 369M | 92,141% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.10 | 2.92 | 278% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.39 | 21.32 | 293% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.65 | 13.69 | 268% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.78 | 50.01 | 188% |