Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs WLGRX
RGEBX vs WLGRX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs WLGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$85.45
Change+$0.51 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Nomura Large Cap Growth R
Price$32.94
Change-$2.98 (-8.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.87B
RGEBX vs WLGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. WLGRX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a StrongBuy and WLGRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. WLGRX (7.87B). RGEBX (0.00) and WLGRX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGEBX was incepted earlier than WLGRX: RGEBX (11 years) vs WLGRX (20 years). WLGRX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGRX (18.00). WLGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: WLGRX (0) vs RGEBX (250). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.24 vs. WLGRX (3.91). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 28.63 vs. WLGRX (27.11).
| RGEBX | WLGRX | RGEBX / WLGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.14 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.22 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.393 | 7.900 | 233% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 7.87B | 4,308% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.24 | 3.91 | 160% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.18 | 63.64 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.63 | 27.11 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.53 | 85.54 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement