Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs WLGCX
RGEBX vs WLGCX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs WLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$83.30
Change-$1.87 (-2.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund C
Price$26.19
Change-$0.45 (-1.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.93B
RGEBX vs WLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. WLGCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Buy and WLGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. WLGCX (7.93B). RGEBX (0.00) and WLGCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGEBX was incepted earlier than WLGCX: RGEBX (11 years) vs WLGCX (25 years). WLGCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGCX (18.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLGCX: RGEBX (250) vs WLGCX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.91 vs. WLGCX (4.72). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. WLGCX (15.93).
| RGEBX | WLGCX | RGEBX / WLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.64 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.72 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.601 | 9.539 | 174% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 7.93B | 4,286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.91 | 4.72 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.66 | 39.77 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.65 | 15.93 | 211% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.06 | 59.71 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers