Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs WLGCX
RGEBX vs WLGCX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs WLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$75.85
Change-$9.36 (-10.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Nomura Large Cap Growth C
Price$21.79
Change-$4.57 (-17.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.21B
RGEBX vs WLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. WLGCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Hold and WLGCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. WLGCX (7.21B). RGEBX (0.00) and WLGCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGEBX was incepted earlier than WLGCX: RGEBX (11 years) vs WLGCX (26 years). WLGCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WLGCX (18.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLGCX: RGEBX (250) vs WLGCX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.80 vs. WLGCX (-10.84). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.88 vs. WLGCX (-2.20).
| RGEBX | WLGCX | RGEBX / WLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.64 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.72 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.057 | -6.078 | 17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 7.21B | 4,659% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.80 | -10.84 | -17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.63 | 27.80 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.88 | -2.20 | -449% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.02 | 56.76 | 194% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers