Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs WLGCX
RGEBX vs WLGCX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs WLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$77.54
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Nomura Large Cap Growth C
Price$23.47
Change+$0.06 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.83B
RGEBX vs WLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. WLGCX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Hold and WLGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. WLGCX (7.83B). RGEBX (0.00) and WLGCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGEBX was incepted earlier than WLGCX: RGEBX (11 years) vs WLGCX (26 years). WLGCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WLGCX (18.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLGCX: RGEBX (250) vs WLGCX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.34 vs. WLGCX (-5.86). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 19.19 vs. WLGCX (8.36).
| RGEBX | WLGCX | RGEBX / WLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.64 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.72 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.539 | -3.495 | -244% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 7.83B | 4,331% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.34 | -5.86 | -91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.50 | 52.30 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.19 | 8.36 | 230% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.00 | 46.23 | 188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers