Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs WFOPX
RGEBX vs WFOPX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs WFOPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$80.73
Change+$0.27 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
Allspring Opportunity C
Price$45.08
Change+$0.22 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
RGEBX vs WFOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. WFOPX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Buy and WFOPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. WFOPX (1.92B). RGEBX (0.00) and WFOPX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGEBX was incepted earlier than WFOPX: RGEBX (11 years) vs WFOPX (17 years). WFOPX (1.94) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WFOPX (20.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFOPX: RGEBX (250) vs WFOPX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.90 vs. WFOPX (1.67). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.14 vs. WFOPX (14.04).
| RGEBX | WFOPX | RGEBX / WFOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.92 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.94 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.004 | 4.643 | 280% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 1.92B | 17,092% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.90 | 1.67 | 1,013% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.95 | 13.07 | 428% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.14 | 14.04 | 322% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.81 | 0.22 | 35,102% |