Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs TWCCX
RGEBX vs TWCCX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs TWCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$77.85
Change-$0.83 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
American Century Ultra® C
Price$58.71
Change-$0.70 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.87B
RGEBX vs TWCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. TWCCX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Hold and TWCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. TWCCX (26.9B). RGEBX (0.00) and TWCCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGEBX was incepted earlier than TWCCX: RGEBX (11 years) vs TWCCX (24 years). TWCCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TWCCX (7.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TWCCX: RGEBX (250) vs TWCCX (2500). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.68 vs. TWCCX (-4.61). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 16.94 vs. TWCCX (2.46).
| RGEBX | TWCCX | RGEBX / TWCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.87 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.92 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.552 | -0.085 | -1,824% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 26.9B | 1,249% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.68 | -4.61 | -188% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.46 | 42.81 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.94 | 2.46 | 688% |
| Returns for 10 years | 111.87 | 116.48 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers