Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGEBX vs TRSAX
RGEBX vs TRSAX Comparison
Open Charts RGEBX vs TRSAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$75.85
Change-$9.36 (-10.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Adv
Price$98.31
Change-$18.82 (-16.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.79B
RGEBX vs TRSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGEBX vs. TRSAX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGEBX is a Hold and TRSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. TRSAX (49.8B). RGEBX (0.00) and TRSAX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGEBX was incepted earlier than TRSAX: RGEBX (11 years) vs TRSAX (24 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than TRSAX (0.91). TRSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.20 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRSAX: RGEBX (250) vs TRSAX (2500). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.80 vs. TRSAX (-4.09). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.88 vs. TRSAX (-1.26).
| RGEBX | TRSAX | RGEBX / TRSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.91 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 0.91 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.057 | -3.759 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 49.8B | 675% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.80 | -4.09 | -44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.63 | 46.21 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.88 | -1.26 | -787% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.02 | 118.22 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement