RGCCF
Price
$0.25
Change
+$0.01 (+4.17%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
7.55M
VMSSF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
4.99M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RGCCF vs VMSSF

Header iconRGCCF vs VMSSF Comparison
Open Charts RGCCF vs VMSSFBanner chart's image
RELEVANT GOLD
Price$0.25
Change+$0.01 (+4.17%)
Volume$22.94K
Capitalization7.55M
Vortex Metals
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$58.15K
Capitalization4.99M
RGCCF vs VMSSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RGCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VMSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RGCCF vs. VMSSF commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGCCF is a Hold and VMSSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (RGCCF: $0.25 vs. VMSSF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: RGCCF and VMSSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RGCCF: 63% vs. VMSSF: 141%
Market capitalization -- RGCCF: $7.55M vs. VMSSF: $4.99M
RGCCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $7.55M. VMSSF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $4.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RGCCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVMSSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RGCCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VMSSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both RGCCF and VMSSF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RGCCF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VMSSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RGCCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VMSSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VMSSF is a better buy in the short-term than RGCCF.

Price Growth

RGCCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.03% price change this week, while VMSSF (@Precious Metals) price change was +0.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -0.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +53.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-0.98% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGCCF($7.55M) has a higher market cap than VMSSF($4.99M). RGCCF YTD gains are higher at: 32.979 vs. VMSSF (-50.000). VMSSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.38M vs. RGCCF (-5.98M). VMSSF has more cash in the bank: 1.66M vs. RGCCF (766K). RGCCF (0) and VMSSF (0) have equivalent revenues.
RGCCFVMSSFRGCCF / VMSSF
Capitalization7.55M4.99M151%
EBITDA-5.98M-2.38M251%
Gain YTD32.979-50.000-66%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash766K1.66M46%
Total DebtN/A21.2K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RGCCFVMSSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RGCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VMSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BPOP110.512.48
+2.30%
Popular
FLNT1.94N/A
N/A
Fluent
SHEL70.98-0.01
-0.01%
Shell plc
JBIO9.19-0.06
-0.65%
Jade Biosciences Inc
IRWD0.73-0.05
-6.08%
Ironwood Pharmaceuticals

RGCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGCCF and GMINF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGCCF and GMINF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGCCF
1D Price
Change %
RGCCF100%
+3.07%
GMINF - RGCCF
28%
Poorly correlated
-8.03%
DCHRF - RGCCF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DDEJF - RGCCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.56%
GGAZF - RGCCF
12%
Poorly correlated
+8.87%
FSTTF - RGCCF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

VMSSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VMSSF and RIOFF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VMSSF and RIOFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VMSSF
1D Price
Change %
VMSSF100%
N/A
RIOFF - VMSSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
BDLNF - VMSSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RNDXF - VMSSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSTTF - VMSSF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RGCCF - VMSSF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.07%
More