RGCCF
Price
$0.29
Change
-$0.01 (-3.33%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
29.07M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SNGCF
Price
$0.21
Change
-$0.01 (-4.55%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
89.3M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

RGCCF vs SNGCF

Header iconRGCCF vs SNGCF Comparison
Open Charts RGCCF vs SNGCFBanner chart's image
RELEVANT GOLD
Price$0.29
Change-$0.01 (-3.33%)
Volume$55.17K
Capitalization29.07M
Sanu Gold
Price$0.21
Change-$0.01 (-4.55%)
Volume$25K
Capitalization89.3M
RGCCF vs SNGCF Comparison Chart in %
RGCCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SNGCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RGCCF vs. SNGCF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGCCF is a Hold and SNGCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (RGCCF: $0.29 vs. SNGCF: $0.21)
Brand notoriety: RGCCF and SNGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RGCCF: 144% vs. SNGCF: 33%
Market capitalization -- RGCCF: $29.07M vs. SNGCF: $89.3M
RGCCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $29.07M. SNGCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $89.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $115.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RGCCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSNGCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RGCCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SNGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SNGCF is a better buy in the long-term than RGCCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RGCCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNGCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RGCCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SNGCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RGCCF is a better buy in the short-term than SNGCF.

Price Growth

RGCCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.04% price change this week, while SNGCF (@Precious Metals) price change was +2.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8738.91%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.30% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SNGCF($89.3M) has a higher market cap than RGCCF($29.1M). SNGCF YTD gains are higher at: 76.989 vs. RGCCF (54.255). SNGCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.3M vs. RGCCF (-4.02M). SNGCF has more cash in the bank: 12.4M vs. RGCCF (7.13M). RGCCF (0) and SNGCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
RGCCFSNGCFRGCCF / SNGCF
Capitalization29.1M89.3M33%
EBITDA-4.02M-2.3M174%
Gain YTD54.25576.98970%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash7.13M12.4M58%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RGCCFSNGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RGCCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SNGCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZOMDF0.10N/A
+2.36%
Zomedica Corp.
NEXNY71.231.37
+1.97%
Nexans Paris ACT
KRKNF3.980.06
+1.53%
Kraken Robotics Inc.
BLTMF0.07N/A
N/A
Orbec Gold Mines Inc.
AONNY15.39-0.15
-0.97%
Aeon Co. Ltd.

RGCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGCCF and OMMSF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGCCF and OMMSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGCCF
1D Price
Change %
RGCCF100%
-2.32%
OMMSF - RGCCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
ATLX - RGCCF
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.27%
SXNTF - RGCCF
2%
Poorly correlated
+5.45%
GGGOF - RGCCF
-6%
Poorly correlated
-3.49%
SNGCF - RGCCF
-7%
Poorly correlated
-3.18%
More

SNGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SNGCF and GLNS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNGCF and GLNS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNGCF
1D Price
Change %
SNGCF100%
+10.72%
GLNS - SNGCF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATLX - SNGCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.06%
LUGDF - SNGCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+4.88%
GGAZF - SNGCF
4%
Poorly correlated
+6.10%
LGCFF - SNGCF
3%
Poorly correlated
+14.08%
More