RGC
Price
$5.94
Change
-$0.16 (-2.62%)
Updated
Nov 15, 01:35 PM (EDT)
SBFM
Price
$2.61
Change
+$0.04 (+1.56%)
Updated
Nov 15, 03:39 PM (EDT)
Ad is loading...

RGC vs SBFM

Header iconRGC vs SBFM Comparison
Open Charts RGC vs SBFMBanner chart's image
Regencell Bioscience Holdings
Price$5.94
Change-$0.16 (-2.62%)
Volume$1.4K
CapitalizationN/A
Sunshine Biopharma
Price$2.61
Change+$0.04 (+1.56%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
RGC vs SBFM Comparison Chart
Loading...
SBFM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RGC vs. SBFM commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGC is a Buy and SBFM is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (RGC: $6.10 vs. SBFM: $2.57)
Brand notoriety: RGC and SBFM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RGC: 49% vs. SBFM: 22%
Market capitalization -- RGC: $50.75M vs. SBFM: $6.02M
RGC [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $50.75M. SBFM’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $6.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $77.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $3.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RGC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSBFM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RGC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SBFM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBFM is a better buy in the long-term than RGC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SBFM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SBFM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

RGC (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -15.86% price change this week, while SBFM (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -5.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -4.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

RGC is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2022.

SBFM is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-4.99% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGC($50.8M) has a higher market cap than SBFM($6.02M). RGC YTD gains are higher at: -41.905 vs. SBFM (-99.527). RGC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -4.67M vs. SBFM (-26.1M). SBFM has more cash in the bank: 18.8M vs. RGC (306K). SBFM has less debt than RGC: SBFM (674K) vs RGC (3.54M). SBFM has higher revenues than RGC: SBFM (20.4M) vs RGC (0).
RGCSBFMRGC / SBFM
Capitalization50.8M6.02M844%
EBITDA-4.67M-26.1M18%
Gain YTD-41.905-99.52742%
P/E RatioN/A0.88-
Revenue020.4M-
Total Cash306K18.8M2%
Total Debt3.54M674K526%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RGC vs SBFM: Fundamental Ratings
RGC
SBFM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2657
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6094
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10088
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBFM's Valuation (36) in the null industry is in the same range as RGC (61) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that SBFM’s stock grew similarly to RGC’s over the last 12 months.

SBFM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RGC (100) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that SBFM’s stock grew similarly to RGC’s over the last 12 months.

SBFM's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as RGC (100) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that SBFM’s stock grew similarly to RGC’s over the last 12 months.

RGC's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBFM (94) in the null industry. This means that RGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBFM’s over the last 12 months.

SBFM's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as RGC (100) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that SBFM’s stock grew similarly to RGC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SBFM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SBFM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

RGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGC and QNTM have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGC and QNTM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGC
1D Price
Change %
RGC100%
-3.17%
QNTM - RGC
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
CLCFF - RGC
21%
Poorly correlated
-13.49%
SBFM - RGC
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
IRWD - RGC
5%
Poorly correlated
-4.53%
KMDA - RGC
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.82%
More

SBFM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBFM has been loosely correlated with HNSPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SBFM jumps, then HNSPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBFM
1D Price
Change %
SBFM100%
+0.39%
HNSPF - SBFM
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CHSYF - SBFM
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EVOK - SBFM
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.48%
BGPPF - SBFM
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SIGA - SBFM
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.69%
More