Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs ZVNBX
RGAHX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$83.30
Change+$0.28 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$42.25
Change+$0.38 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets146.51M
RGAHX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Buy and ZVNBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. ZVNBX (147M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: RGAHX (0.47) vs ZVNBX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: RGAHX (10 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (13.62). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: RGAHX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.84 vs. RGAHX (17.89). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 49.57 vs. ZVNBX (39.16).
| RGAHX | ZVNBX | RGAHX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.30 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.52 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.426 | 11.684 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 147M | 223,129% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.89 | 38.84 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.90 | 119.71 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.57 | 39.16 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers