Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs ZVNBX
RGAHX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$87.85
Change+$0.38 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.05B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$42.24
Change+$0.42 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets131.53M
RGAHX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a StrongBuy and ZVNBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. ZVNBX (132M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: RGAHX (0.44) vs ZVNBX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: RGAHX (10 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (15.24). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: RGAHX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.14 vs. ZVNBX (5.00). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 32.51 vs. ZVNBX (3.54).
| RGAHX | ZVNBX | RGAHX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.30 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.52 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.104 | 10.547 | 181% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 132M | 257,576% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.14 | 5.00 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.15 | 108.47 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.51 | 3.54 | 918% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.22 | 306.81 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement