Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs ZVNBX
RGAHX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$77.22
Change-$0.93 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$40.04
Change-$0.44 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.53M
RGAHX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Buy and ZVNBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. ZVNBX (139M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: RGAHX (0.50) vs ZVNBX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: RGAHX (10 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (13.62). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: RGAHX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.25 vs. RGAHX (7.38). ZVNBX (51.27) and RGAHX (49.84) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RGAHX | ZVNBX | RGAHX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.30 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.52 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.147 | 5.842 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306B | 139M | 220,144% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.38 | 28.25 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.85 | 128.54 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.84 | 51.27 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement