Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs ZVNBX
RGAHX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$88.05
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.52B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$42.79
Change-$0.11 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.71M
RGAHX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Buy and ZVNBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. ZVNBX (135M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: RGAHX (0.44) vs ZVNBX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: RGAHX (10 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (15.24). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: RGAHX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.29 vs. RGAHX (9.02). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 40.79 vs. ZVNBX (17.07).
| RGAHX | ZVNBX | RGAHX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.30 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.52 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.894 | 13.111 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 135M | 252,593% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.02 | 11.29 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.43 | 113.42 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.79 | 17.07 | 239% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 333.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers