Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs ZVNBX
RGAHX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$80.13
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$42.03
Change-$0.18 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.34M
RGAHX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Dec 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Hold and ZVNBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. ZVNBX (132M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: RGAHX (0.44) vs ZVNBX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: RGAHX (10 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ZVNBX (15.24). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: RGAHX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.32 vs. RGAHX (5.91). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 23.08 vs. ZVNBX (-5.12).
| RGAHX | ZVNBX | RGAHX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.30 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.46 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.109 | 11.102 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 132M | 256,818% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.91 | 6.32 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.08 | 150.63 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.08 | -5.12 | -451% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.58 | 310.05 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement