Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs ZVGNX
RGAHX vs ZVGNX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs ZVGNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$83.30
Change+$0.28 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
Zevenbergen Genea Investor
Price$57.79
Change+$0.64 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets77.08M
RGAHX vs ZVGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. ZVGNX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Buy and ZVGNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. ZVGNX (77.1M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than ZVGNX: RGAHX (0.47) vs ZVGNX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than ZVGNX: RGAHX (10 years) vs ZVGNX (10 years). ZVGNX (1.62) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVGNX (18.83). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVGNX: RGAHX (250) vs ZVGNX (2500). ZVGNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 51.60 vs. RGAHX (17.89). ZVGNX return over 5 years is better than : 65.07 vs. RGAHX (49.57).
| RGAHX | ZVGNX | RGAHX / ZVGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.30 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.62 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.426 | 17.412 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 77.1M | 425,422% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.89 | 51.60 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.90 | 132.84 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.57 | 65.07 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |