Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs ZVGNX
RGAHX vs ZVGNX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs ZVGNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$86.13
Change-$1.92 (-2.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Zevenbergen Genea Investor
Price$60.37
Change-$0.54 (-0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.85M
RGAHX vs ZVGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. ZVGNX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Buy and ZVGNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. ZVGNX (78.9M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than ZVGNX: RGAHX (0.44) vs ZVGNX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than ZVGNX: RGAHX (10 years) vs ZVGNX (10 years). ZVGNX (1.62) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVGNX (11.55). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVGNX: RGAHX (250) vs ZVGNX (2500). ZVGNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.08 vs. RGAHX (9.02). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 40.79 vs. ZVGNX (34.97).
| RGAHX | ZVGNX | RGAHX / ZVGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.30 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.62 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.894 | 22.653 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 78.9M | 430,925% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.02 | 22.08 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.43 | 138.62 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.79 | 34.97 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 494.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement