Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs ZVGNX
RGAHX vs ZVGNX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs ZVGNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$88.38
Change+$0.53 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Zevenbergen Genea Investor
Price$58.17
Change+$0.63 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.85M
RGAHX vs ZVGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. ZVGNX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a StrongBuy and ZVGNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. ZVGNX (74.9M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than ZVGNX: RGAHX (0.44) vs ZVGNX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than ZVGNX: RGAHX (10 years) vs ZVGNX (10 years). ZVGNX (1.62) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVGNX (11.55). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVGNX: RGAHX (250) vs ZVGNX (2500). ZVGNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.15 vs. RGAHX (7.14). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 32.51 vs. ZVGNX (12.82).
| RGAHX | ZVGNX | RGAHX / ZVGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.30 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.62 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.104 | 16.904 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 74.9M | 452,603% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.14 | 10.15 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.15 | 130.16 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.51 | 12.82 | 254% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.22 | 436.25 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement