Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs WLGRX
RGAHX vs WLGRX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs WLGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$80.13
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Nomura Large Cap Growth R
Price$33.45
Change+$0.09 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.83B
RGAHX vs WLGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. WLGRX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Hold and WLGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. WLGRX (7.83B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than WLGRX: RGAHX (0.44) vs WLGRX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than WLGRX: RGAHX (10 years) vs WLGRX (20 years). WLGRX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WLGRX (18.00). WLGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: WLGRX (0) vs RGAHX (250). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.91 vs. WLGRX (-1.96). WLGRX (24.26) and RGAHX (23.08) have equivalent 5 years return.
| RGAHX | WLGRX | RGAHX / WLGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.14 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.22 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.109 | 0.481 | 1,895% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 7.83B | 4,331% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.91 | -1.96 | -301% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.08 | 63.17 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.08 | 24.26 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.58 | 84.60 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement