Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs WLGRX
RGAHX vs WLGRX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs WLGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$86.76
Change+$0.18 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund R
Price$35.50
Change+$0.20 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.85B
RGAHX vs WLGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. WLGRX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Hold and WLGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. WLGRX (7.85B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than WLGRX: RGAHX (0.45) vs WLGRX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than WLGRX: RGAHX (10 years) vs WLGRX (20 years). WLGRX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGRX (18.00). WLGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: WLGRX (0) vs RGAHX (250). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.73 vs. WLGRX (6.51). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 40.74 vs. WLGRX (27.56).
| RGAHX | WLGRX | RGAHX / WLGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.14 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.22 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.137 | 6.639 | 273% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 7.85B | 4,292% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.73 | 6.51 | 180% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.76 | 54.75 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.74 | 27.56 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement