Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs WLGCX
RGAHX vs WLGCX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs WLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$80.13
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Nomura Large Cap Growth C
Price$23.47
Change+$0.06 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.83B
RGAHX vs WLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. WLGCX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Hold and WLGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. WLGCX (7.83B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than WLGCX: RGAHX (0.44) vs WLGCX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than WLGCX: RGAHX (10 years) vs WLGCX (26 years). WLGCX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WLGCX (18.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLGCX: RGAHX (250) vs WLGCX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.91 vs. WLGCX (-5.86). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 23.08 vs. WLGCX (8.36).
| RGAHX | WLGCX | RGAHX / WLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.64 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.72 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.109 | -3.495 | -261% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 7.83B | 4,331% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.91 | -5.86 | -101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.08 | 52.30 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.08 | 8.36 | 276% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.58 | 46.23 | 205% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers