Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs WFOPX
RGAHX vs WFOPX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs WFOPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$84.02
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
Allspring Opportunity C
Price$45.11
Change-$0.13 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.91B
RGAHX vs WFOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. WFOPX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Buy and WFOPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. WFOPX (1.91B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than WFOPX: RGAHX (0.47) vs WFOPX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than WFOPX: RGAHX (10 years) vs WFOPX (17 years). WFOPX (1.94) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WFOPX (20.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFOPX: RGAHX (250) vs WFOPX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.81 vs. WFOPX (-0.94). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 44.92 vs. WFOPX (8.39).
| RGAHX | WFOPX | RGAHX / WFOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.92 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.94 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.406 | 4.712 | 306% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 1.91B | 17,216% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.81 | -0.94 | -1,568% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.02 | 1.26 | 3,423% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.92 | 8.39 | 536% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -0.39 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement