Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs WFOPX
RGAHX vs WFOPX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs WFOPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$84.93
Change+$0.88 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Allspring Opportunity C
Price$45.56
Change+$0.43 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
RGAHX vs WFOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. WFOPX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Buy and WFOPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. WFOPX (1.92B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than WFOPX: RGAHX (0.46) vs WFOPX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than WFOPX: RGAHX (10 years) vs WFOPX (17 years). WFOPX (1.94) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WFOPX (20.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFOPX: RGAHX (250) vs WFOPX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.60 vs. WFOPX (-0.11). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 42.94 vs. WFOPX (6.64).
| RGAHX | WFOPX | RGAHX / WFOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.92 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.94 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.918 | 5.525 | 288% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 1.92B | 17,328% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.60 | -0.11 | -16,926% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.57 | 13.25 | 457% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.94 | 6.64 | 647% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 5.92 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement