Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs TWCUX
RGAHX vs TWCUX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs TWCUX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$80.13
Change-$0.01 (-0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
American Century Ultra® I
Price$95.62
Change+$0.05 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.15B
RGAHX vs TWCUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. TWCUX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Hold and TWCUX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. TWCUX (27.2B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than TWCUX: RGAHX (0.44) vs TWCUX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than TWCUX: RGAHX (10 years) vs TWCUX (44 years). TWCUX (0.92) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TWCUX (7.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than TWCUX: RGAHX (250) vs TWCUX (2500). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.75 vs. TWCUX (-1.40). TWCUX return over 5 years is better than : 27.22 vs. RGAHX (23.10).
| RGAHX | TWCUX | RGAHX / TWCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.87 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.92 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.123 | 2.411 | 378% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 27.2B | 1,246% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.75 | -1.40 | -410% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.91 | 72.63 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.10 | 27.22 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.48 | 172.52 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers