Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs TWCCX
RGAHX vs TWCCX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs TWCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$78.44
Change-$9.61 (-10.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
American Century Ultra® C
Price$57.45
Change-$12.57 (-17.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.37B
RGAHX vs TWCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. TWCCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Hold and TWCCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. TWCCX (26.4B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than TWCCX: RGAHX (0.43) vs TWCCX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than TWCCX: RGAHX (10 years) vs TWCCX (24 years). TWCCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TWCCX (15.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than TWCCX: RGAHX (250) vs TWCCX (2500). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.79 vs. TWCCX (-8.66). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.96 vs. TWCCX (-4.60).
| RGAHX | TWCCX | RGAHX / TWCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.87 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 1.92 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.010 | -2.229 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 26.4B | 1,273% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.79 | -8.66 | -32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.40 | 28.99 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.96 | -4.60 | -303% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.50 | 117.45 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement