Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAHX vs STCZX
RGAHX vs STCZX Comparison
Open Charts RGAHX vs STCZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$86.13
Change-$1.92 (-2.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Virtus Silvant Large-Cap Growth Stk R6
Price$18.47
Change-$0.39 (-2.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.67M
RGAHX vs STCZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAHX vs. STCZX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAHX is a Buy and STCZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. STCZX (263M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than STCZX: RGAHX (0.44) vs STCZX (0.00). RGAHX was incepted earlier than STCZX: RGAHX (10 years) vs STCZX (11 years). STCZX (0.92) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. STCZX (12.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than STCZX: RGAHX (250) vs STCZX (2500000). STCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.32 vs. RGAHX (9.02). STCZX return over 5 years is better than : 81.17 vs. RGAHX (40.79).
| RGAHX | STCZX | RGAHX / STCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.72 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.92 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.894 | 19.746 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 263M | 129,278% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.02 | 18.32 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.43 | 113.83 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.79 | 81.17 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 81.17 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement