Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs ZVNBX
RGAGX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$86.49
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$41.84
Change+$0.21 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.09M
RGAGX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Buy and ZVNBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. ZVNBX (143M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: RGAGX (0.59) vs ZVNBX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: RGAGX (16 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (13.62). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: RGAGX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.83 vs. RGAGX (18.90). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 44.13 vs. ZVNBX (27.29).
| RGAGX | ZVNBX | RGAGX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.30 | 23% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.52 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.016 | 10.600 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 143M | 232,168% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.90 | 30.83 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.40 | 101.93 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.13 | 27.29 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.81 | 319.66 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers