Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs WPCSX
RGAGX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$83.01
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$48.90
Change+$0.53 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets751M
RGAGX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. WPCSX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Buy and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. WPCSX (751M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: RGAGX (0.61) vs WPCSX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: RGAGX (16 years) vs WPCSX (11 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). RGAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (11.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: RGAGX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.27 vs. WPCSX (-2.18). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 51.38 vs. WPCSX (22.53).
| RGAGX | WPCSX | RGAGX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.75 | 17% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.75 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.348 | 6.397 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 751M | 43,009% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.27 | -2.18 | -517% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.98 | 21.76 | 280% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.38 | 22.53 | 228% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.12 | 72.55 | 123% |