Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs USLCX
RGAGX vs USLCX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs USLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$86.97
Change+$0.48 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth C
Price$45.02
Change+$0.19 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.04B
RGAGX vs USLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. USLCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Buy and USLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. USLCX (2.04B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than USLCX: RGAGX (0.59) vs USLCX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than USLCX: RGAGX (16 years) vs USLCX (23 years). USLCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). USLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than USLCX: RGAGX (250) vs USLCX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.13 vs. USLCX (-12.14). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 46.68 vs. USLCX (-11.34).
| RGAGX | USLCX | RGAGX / USLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.88 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.89 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.660 | 2.505 | 665% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 2.04B | 16,282% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.13 | -12.14 | -182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.30 | 15.64 | 347% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.68 | -11.34 | -412% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.98 | 23.72 | 438% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement