Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs USLCX
RGAGX vs USLCX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs USLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$84.62
Change+$0.29 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
JHancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth C
Price$45.96
Change+$0.22 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
RGAGX vs USLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. USLCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Buy and USLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. USLCX (2.11B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than USLCX: RGAGX (0.61) vs USLCX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than USLCX: RGAGX (16 years) vs USLCX (23 years). USLCX (1.89) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). USLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than USLCX: RGAGX (250) vs USLCX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.20 vs. USLCX (-8.28). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 50.83 vs. USLCX (-4.35).
| RGAGX | USLCX | RGAGX / USLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.88 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.89 | 16% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.508 | 4.645 | 291% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 2.11B | 15,523% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.20 | -8.28 | -220% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.73 | 22.79 | 262% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.83 | -4.35 | -1,169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.40 | 20.09 | 445% |