Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs UMLGX
RGAGX vs UMLGX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs UMLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$87.77
Change+$0.34 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.88B
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst
Price$7.77
Change+$0.04 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets651.27M
RGAGX vs UMLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. UMLGX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Buy and UMLGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. UMLGX (651M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than UMLGX: RGAGX (0.59) vs UMLGX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than UMLGX: RGAGX (16 years) vs UMLGX (28 years). UMLGX (0.94) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). UMLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMLGX: RGAGX (250) vs UMLGX (2000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.24 vs. UMLGX (-14.52). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 49.92 vs. UMLGX (-47.78).
| RGAGX | UMLGX | RGAGX / UMLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.80 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.94 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.733 | -10.997 | -161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 651M | 51,767% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.24 | -14.52 | -91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.37 | 16.49 | 451% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.92 | -47.78 | -104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.54 | -51.89 | -228% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement