Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs UMLGX
RGAGX vs UMLGX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs UMLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$83.01
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth Inst
Price$7.81
Change+$0.10 (+1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets723.91M
RGAGX vs UMLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. UMLGX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Buy and UMLGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. UMLGX (724M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than UMLGX: RGAGX (0.61) vs UMLGX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than UMLGX: RGAGX (16 years) vs UMLGX (28 years). UMLGX (0.94) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). UMLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than UMLGX: RGAGX (250) vs UMLGX (2000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.27 vs. UMLGX (-14.74). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 51.38 vs. UMLGX (-42.19).
| RGAGX | UMLGX | RGAGX / UMLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.80 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.94 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.348 | -10.538 | -108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 724M | 44,613% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.27 | -14.74 | -76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.98 | 11.57 | 527% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.38 | -42.19 | -122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.12 | -57.39 | -155% |