Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs TRSAX
RGAGX vs TRSAX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs TRSAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$81.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Adv
Price$103.79
Change+$0.06 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.36B
RGAGX vs TRSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. TRSAX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Hold and TRSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. TRSAX (51.4B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than TRSAX: RGAGX (0.57) vs TRSAX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than TRSAX: RGAGX (17 years) vs TRSAX (24 years). TRSAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.29). TRSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.20 vs. RGAGX (32.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRSAX: RGAGX (250) vs TRSAX (2500). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.11 vs. TRSAX (-0.63). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 24.27 vs. TRSAX (10.99).
| RGAGX | TRSAX | RGAGX / TRSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.91 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.29 | 0.91 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.309 | 2.681 | 347% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 51.4B | 660% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.11 | -0.63 | -966% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.25 | 75.83 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.27 | 10.99 | 221% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.87 | 93.57 | 105% |