Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs TBDCX
RGAGX vs TBDCX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs TBDCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$84.62
Change+$0.29 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth C
Price$12.79
Change+$0.06 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets412.01M
RGAGX vs TBDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. TBDCX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Buy and TBDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. TBDCX (412M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than TBDCX: RGAGX (0.61) vs TBDCX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than TBDCX: RGAGX (16 years) vs TBDCX (26 years). TBDCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). TBDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDCX: RGAGX (250) vs TBDCX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.20 vs. TBDCX (1.27). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 50.83 vs. TBDCX (-1.54).
| RGAGX | TBDCX | RGAGX / TBDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.90 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.96 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.508 | 8.944 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 412M | 79,612% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.20 | 1.27 | 1,437% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.73 | 55.98 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.83 | -1.54 | -3,302% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.40 | 22.98 | 389% |