Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs TBDCX
RGAGX vs TBDCX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs TBDCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$85.36
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth C
Price$12.91
Change-$0.03 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets416.56M
RGAGX vs TBDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. TBDCX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Buy and TBDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. TBDCX (417M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than TBDCX: RGAGX (0.60) vs TBDCX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than TBDCX: RGAGX (16 years) vs TBDCX (26 years). TBDCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). TBDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDCX: RGAGX (250) vs TBDCX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.11 vs. TBDCX (-1.83). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 46.14 vs. TBDCX (-6.45).
| RGAGX | TBDCX | RGAGX / TBDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.90 | 16% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 1.96 | 15% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.500 | 9.966 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 417M | 78,897% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.11 | -1.83 | -828% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.78 | 40.33 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.14 | -6.45 | -715% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.14 | 24.49 | 368% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement