Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAGX vs SLGCX
RGAGX vs SLGCX Comparison
Open Charts RGAGX vs SLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$83.01
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth C
Price$5.65
Change+$0.08 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.44M
RGAGX vs SLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAGX vs. SLGCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAGX is a Buy and SLGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. SLGCX (39.4M). RGAGX pays higher dividends than SLGCX: RGAGX (0.61) vs SLGCX (0.00). RGAGX was incepted earlier than SLGCX: RGAGX (16 years) vs SLGCX (27 years). SLGCX (2.67) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). SLGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX (250) and SLGCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.27 vs. SLGCX (-46.65). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 51.38 vs. SLGCX (-61.90).
| RGAGX | SLGCX | RGAGX / SLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 2.67 | 11% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 2.67 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.348 | 9.709 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 39.4M | 819,797% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.27 | -46.65 | -24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.98 | -39.12 | -156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.38 | -61.90 | -83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.12 | -74.87 | -119% |