Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAFX vs ZVNBX
RGAFX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts RGAFX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$86.32
Change+$0.21 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$41.84
Change+$0.21 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.09M
RGAFX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAFX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAFX is a Buy and ZVNBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. ZVNBX (143M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than ZVNBX: RGAFX (0.55) vs ZVNBX (0.00). RGAFX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: RGAFX (23 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (13.62). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: RGAFX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.83 vs. RGAFX (18.84). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.89 vs. ZVNBX (27.29).
| RGAFX | ZVNBX | RGAFX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.30 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.52 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.990 | 10.600 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 143M | 232,168% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.84 | 30.83 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.27 | 101.93 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.89 | 27.29 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.47 | 319.66 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement