Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAFX vs ZVGNX
RGAFX vs ZVGNX Comparison
Open Charts RGAFX vs ZVGNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$85.19
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
Zevenbergen Genea Investor
Price$57.04
Change+$0.36 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.23M
RGAFX vs ZVGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAFX vs. ZVGNX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAFX is a Buy and ZVGNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. ZVGNX (75.2M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than ZVGNX: RGAFX (0.56) vs ZVGNX (0.00). RGAFX was incepted earlier than ZVGNX: RGAFX (23 years) vs ZVGNX (10 years). ZVGNX (1.62) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVGNX (18.83). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVGNX: RGAFX (250) vs ZVGNX (2500). ZVGNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.78 vs. RGAFX (15.05). ZVGNX return over 5 years is better than : 54.12 vs. RGAFX (45.91).
| RGAFX | ZVGNX | RGAFX / ZVGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.30 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.62 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.472 | 15.888 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 75.2M | 437,500% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.05 | 41.78 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.63 | 77.97 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.91 | 54.12 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement