Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAFX vs WSACX
RGAFX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts RGAFX vs WSACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$79.62
Change-$9.66 (-10.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Wellington Shields All-Cap Instl
Price$34.09
Change+$1.54 (+4.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.48M
RGAFX vs WSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAFX vs. WSACX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAFX is a Hold and WSACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. WSACX (71.5M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than WSACX: RGAFX (0.50) vs WSACX (0.00). RGAFX was incepted earlier than WSACX: RGAFX (24 years) vs WSACX (31 years). WSACX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). WSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.77 vs. RGAFX (32.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: RGAFX (250) vs WSACX (5000). WSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.29 vs. RGAFX (3.03). WSACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.14 vs. RGAFX (14.93).
| RGAFX | WSACX | RGAFX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.34 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.34 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.995 | 4.092 | -24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 71.5M | 469,930% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.03 | 18.29 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.30 | 55.93 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.93 | 30.14 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.97 | 69.97 | 176% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers