Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAFX vs WPCSX
RGAFX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts RGAFX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$85.19
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$48.96
Change-$0.12 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets735.29M
RGAFX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAFX vs. WPCSX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAFX is a Buy and WPCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. WPCSX (735M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: RGAFX (0.56) vs WPCSX (0.00). RGAFX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: RGAFX (23 years) vs WPCSX (11 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (11.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: RGAFX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.05 vs. WPCSX (-3.32). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.91 vs. WPCSX (14.39).
| RGAFX | WPCSX | RGAFX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.75 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.75 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.472 | 6.527 | 222% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 735M | 44,762% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.05 | -3.32 | -454% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.63 | 7.20 | 606% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.91 | 14.39 | 319% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.80 | 67.96 | 132% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement