Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAFX vs WPCSX
RGAFX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts RGAFX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$82.84
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$48.90
Change+$0.53 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets751M
RGAFX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAFX vs. WPCSX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAFX is a Buy and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. WPCSX (751M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: RGAFX (0.57) vs WPCSX (0.00). RGAFX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: RGAFX (23 years) vs WPCSX (11 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (11.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: RGAFX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.20 vs. WPCSX (-2.18). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 51.12 vs. WPCSX (22.53).
| RGAFX | WPCSX | RGAFX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.75 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.75 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.314 | 6.397 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 751M | 43,009% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.20 | -2.18 | -514% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.78 | 21.76 | 279% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.12 | 22.53 | 227% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.74 | 72.55 | 122% |