Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAFX vs WPCSX
RGAFX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts RGAFX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$86.32
Change+$0.21 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$49.12
Change+$0.46 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets725.27M
RGAFX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAFX vs. WPCSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAFX is a Buy and WPCSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. WPCSX (725M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: RGAFX (0.55) vs WPCSX (0.00). RGAFX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: RGAFX (23 years) vs WPCSX (12 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (11.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: RGAFX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.84 vs. WPCSX (-4.88). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.89 vs. WPCSX (12.19).
| RGAFX | WPCSX | RGAFX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.75 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.75 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.990 | 5.701 | 281% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 725M | 45,793% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.84 | -4.88 | -386% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.27 | 18.20 | 337% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.89 | 12.19 | 360% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.47 | 76.14 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement