Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAFX vs WPCSX
RGAFX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts RGAFX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$84.45
Change+$0.28 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$49.81
Change+$0.27 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets755.53M
RGAFX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAFX vs. WPCSX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAFX is a Buy and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. WPCSX (756M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: RGAFX (0.57) vs WPCSX (0.00). RGAFX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: RGAFX (23 years) vs WPCSX (11 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (11.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: RGAFX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.14 vs. WPCSX (1.01). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.57 vs. WPCSX (21.16).
| RGAFX | WPCSX | RGAFX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.75 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.75 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.478 | 8.377 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 756M | 43,386% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.14 | 1.01 | 1,789% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.54 | 21.37 | 279% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.57 | 21.16 | 239% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.02 | 72.89 | 122% |