Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAFX vs WMKGX
RGAFX vs WMKGX Comparison
Open Charts RGAFX vs WMKGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$85.19
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
WesMark Large Company Fund
Price$24.74
Change-$0.06 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets347.22M
RGAFX vs WMKGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAFX vs. WMKGX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAFX is a Buy and WMKGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. WMKGX (347M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than WMKGX: RGAFX (0.56) vs WMKGX (0.10). RGAFX was incepted earlier than WMKGX: RGAFX (23 years) vs WMKGX (28 years). WMKGX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WMKGX (16.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMKGX: RGAFX (250) vs WMKGX (1000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.05 vs. WMKGX (1.55). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.91 vs. WMKGX (12.68).
| RGAFX | WMKGX | RGAFX / WMKGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.16 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.16 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.472 | 7.709 | 188% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 347M | 94,813% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.10 | 582% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.05 | 1.55 | 969% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.63 | 3.77 | 1,157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.91 | 12.68 | 362% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.80 | 29.44 | 305% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement