Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAFX vs WLGRX
RGAFX vs WLGRX Comparison
Open Charts RGAFX vs WLGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$85.19
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund R
Price$35.72
Change+$0.02 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.17B
RGAFX vs WLGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAFX vs. WLGRX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAFX is a Buy and WLGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. WLGRX (8.17B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than WLGRX: RGAFX (0.56) vs WLGRX (0.00). RGAFX was incepted earlier than WLGRX: RGAFX (23 years) vs WLGRX (20 years). WLGRX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGRX (18.00). WLGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: WLGRX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.05 vs. WLGRX (11.59). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.91 vs. WLGRX (34.24).
| RGAFX | WLGRX | RGAFX / WLGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.14 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.24 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.472 | 7.299 | 198% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 8.17B | 4,026% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.05 | 11.59 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.63 | 30.13 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.91 | 34.24 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.80 | 85.75 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement