Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGAFX vs WLGRX
RGAFX vs WLGRX Comparison
Open Charts RGAFX vs WLGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$86.79
Change+$0.47 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund R
Price$35.49
Change+$0.17 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.99B
RGAFX vs WLGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGAFX vs. WLGRX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGAFX is a Buy and WLGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. WLGRX (7.99B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than WLGRX: RGAFX (0.55) vs WLGRX (0.00). RGAFX was incepted earlier than WLGRX: RGAFX (23 years) vs WLGRX (20 years). WLGRX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGRX (18.00). WLGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAFX: WLGRX (0) vs RGAFX (250). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.84 vs. WLGRX (11.53). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.89 vs. WLGRX (29.05).
| RGAFX | WLGRX | RGAFX / WLGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.14 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.24 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.990 | 6.098 | 262% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 7.99B | 4,154% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.84 | 11.53 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.27 | 44.28 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.89 | 29.05 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.47 | 92.79 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement