Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs ZVGIX
RGACX vs ZVGIX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs ZVGIX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$78.34
Change+$0.23 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Zevenbergen Genea Institutional
Price$60.41
Change-$0.02 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.53M
RGACX vs ZVGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. ZVGIX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and ZVGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. ZVGIX (75.5M). RGACX pays higher dividends than ZVGIX: RGACX (0.07) vs ZVGIX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than ZVGIX: RGACX (24 years) vs ZVGIX (10 years). ZVGIX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ZVGIX (11.55). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVGIX: RGACX (250) vs ZVGIX (50000). ZVGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.23 vs. RGACX (5.45). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 20.43 vs. ZVGIX (4.81).
| RGACX | ZVGIX | RGACX / ZVGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.00 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.35 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.821 | 19.671 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 75.5M | 449,007% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.45 | 13.23 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.36 | 177.62 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.43 | 4.81 | 425% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.34 | 475.88 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement