Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs ZVGIX
RGACX vs ZVGIX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs ZVGIX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.70
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Zevenbergen Genea Institutional
Price$61.71
Change+$0.15 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.13M
RGACX vs ZVGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. ZVGIX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and ZVGIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. ZVGIX (78.1M). RGACX pays higher dividends than ZVGIX: RGACX (0.07) vs ZVGIX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than ZVGIX: RGACX (23 years) vs ZVGIX (10 years). ZVGIX (1.32) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVGIX (11.55). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVGIX: RGACX (250) vs ZVGIX (50000). ZVGIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.17 vs. RGACX (11.01). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.85 vs. ZVGIX (29.40).
| RGACX | ZVGIX | RGACX / ZVGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.00 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.32 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.655 | 22.246 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 78.1M | 431,498% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.01 | 39.17 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.57 | 146.84 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.85 | 29.40 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.78 | 514.64 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement