Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WSACX
RGACX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WSACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$78.34
Change+$0.23 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
Wellington Shields All-Cap Instl
Price$33.35
Change+$0.06 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.96M
RGACX vs WSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WSACX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and WSACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. WSACX (70M). RGACX pays higher dividends than WSACX: RGACX (0.07) vs WSACX (0.01). RGACX was incepted earlier than WSACX: RGACX (24 years) vs WSACX (31 years). WSACX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). WSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.77 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: RGACX (250) vs WSACX (5000). WSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.00 vs. RGACX (5.45). WSACX return over 5 years is better than : 31.84 vs. RGACX (20.43).
| RGACX | WSACX | RGACX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.34 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.34 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.821 | 20.094 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 70M | 484,286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.01 | 854% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.45 | 12.00 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.36 | 53.18 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.43 | 31.84 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.34 | 49.29 | 187% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement