Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WSACX
RGACX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WSACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$78.65
Change-$0.84 (-1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
Wellington Shields All-Cap Instl
Price$34.19
Change-$0.13 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.98M
RGACX vs WSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WSACX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and WSACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. WSACX (72M). RGACX (0.00) and WSACX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than WSACX: RGACX (24 years) vs WSACX (31 years). WSACX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). WSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.77 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: RGACX (250) vs WSACX (5000). WSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.24 vs. RGACX (8.96). WSACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.01 vs. RGACX (18.14).
| RGACX | WSACX | RGACX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.34 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.34 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.549 | 4.397 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 72M | 466,667% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.96 | 22.24 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.48 | 54.77 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.14 | 34.01 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 115.80 | 67.09 | 173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement