Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WSACX
RGACX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WSACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.70
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Wellington Shields All-Cap Instl
Price$32.32
Change-$0.02 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.71M
RGACX vs WSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WSACX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and WSACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. WSACX (67.7M). RGACX pays higher dividends than WSACX: RGACX (0.07) vs WSACX (0.06). RGACX was incepted earlier than WSACX: RGACX (23 years) vs WSACX (31 years). WSACX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). WSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.77 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: RGACX (250) vs WSACX (5000). WSACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.76 vs. RGACX (11.01). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.85 vs. WSACX (29.95).
| RGACX | WSACX | RGACX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.34 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.34 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.655 | 16.385 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 67.7M | 497,784% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.06 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.01 | 12.76 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.57 | 38.37 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.85 | 29.95 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.78 | 39.97 | 242% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement