Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WSACX
RGACX vs WSACX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WSACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.62
Change+$0.46 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Wellington Shields All-Cap Instl
Price$30.11
Change+$0.13 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.32M
RGACX vs WSACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WSACX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and WSACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. WSACX (63.3M). RGACX pays higher dividends than WSACX: RGACX (0.07) vs WSACX (0.06). RGACX was incepted earlier than WSACX: RGACX (23 years) vs WSACX (31 years). WSACX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). WSACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.77 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSACX: RGACX (250) vs WSACX (5000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.83 vs. WSACX (14.37). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. WSACX (24.81).
| RGACX | WSACX | RGACX / WSACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.34 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.34 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.516 | 7.958 | 195% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 63.3M | 524,487% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.06 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.83 | 14.37 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.53 | 22.89 | 256% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.02 | 24.81 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.93 | 32.79 | 293% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement