Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WPSZX
RGACX vs WPSZX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WPSZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$86.23
Change+$0.52 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
AB Concentrated Growth Z
Price$56.16
Change-$0.02 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets686.22M
RGACX vs WPSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WPSZX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a StrongBuy and WPSZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. WPSZX (686M). WPSZX pays higher dividends than RGACX: WPSZX (0.15) vs RGACX (0.07). RGACX was incepted earlier than WPSZX: RGACX (24 years) vs WPSZX (12 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than WPSZX (0.72). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSZX (18.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPSZX: RGACX (250) vs WPSZX (2000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.35 vs. WPSZX (-9.12). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 29.99 vs. WPSZX (9.02).
| RGACX | WPSZX | RGACX / WPSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.72 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.72 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.781 | 5.882 | 336% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 686M | 49,417% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.15 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.35 | -9.12 | -81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.74 | 18.17 | 340% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.99 | 9.02 | 332% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.86 | 96.85 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement