Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WPSZX
RGACX vs WPSZX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WPSZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$78.34
Change+$0.23 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
AB Concentrated Growth Z
Price$52.53
Change+$0.17 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets677.6M
RGACX vs WPSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WPSZX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and WPSZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. WPSZX (678M). WPSZX pays higher dividends than RGACX: WPSZX (0.15) vs RGACX (0.07). RGACX was incepted earlier than WPSZX: RGACX (24 years) vs WPSZX (12 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than WPSZX (0.74). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WPSZX (18.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPSZX: RGACX (250) vs WPSZX (2000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.45 vs. WPSZX (-3.26). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 20.43 vs. WPSZX (5.58).
| RGACX | WPSZX | RGACX / WPSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.73 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.74 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.821 | -0.962 | -917% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339B | 678M | 50,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.15 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.45 | -3.26 | -167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.36 | 18.77 | 338% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.43 | 5.58 | 366% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.34 | 91.39 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement