Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WPSZX
RGACX vs WPSZX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WPSZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.70
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
AB Concentrated Growth Z
Price$56.72
Change+$0.19 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets717.28M
RGACX vs WPSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WPSZX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and WPSZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. WPSZX (717M). WPSZX pays higher dividends than RGACX: WPSZX (0.15) vs RGACX (0.07). RGACX was incepted earlier than WPSZX: RGACX (23 years) vs WPSZX (12 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than WPSZX (0.72). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSZX (18.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPSZX: RGACX (250) vs WPSZX (2000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.01 vs. WPSZX (-6.52). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.85 vs. WPSZX (17.57).
| RGACX | WPSZX | RGACX / WPSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.72 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.72 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.655 | 6.938 | 254% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 717M | 47,001% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.15 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.01 | -6.52 | -169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.57 | 33.25 | 212% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.85 | 17.57 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.78 | 100.84 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement