Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WPCSX
RGACX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.05
Change-$1.88 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$48.48
Change-$0.82 (-1.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets717.72M
RGACX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WPCSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. WPCSX (718M). RGACX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: RGACX (0.07) vs WPCSX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: RGACX (24 years) vs WPCSX (12 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (18.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: RGACX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.31 vs. WPCSX (-9.12). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.90 vs. WPCSX (4.60).
| RGACX | WPCSX | RGACX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.75 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.75 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.364 | 7.267 | 266% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 718M | 47,354% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.31 | -9.12 | -91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.31 | 17.46 | 363% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.90 | 4.60 | 823% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.36 | 80.65 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers