Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WPCSX
RGACX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.70
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$48.76
Change+$0.16 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets717.28M
RGACX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WPCSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and WPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. WPCSX (717M). RGACX pays higher dividends than WPCSX: RGACX (0.07) vs WPCSX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: RGACX (23 years) vs WPCSX (12 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPCSX (18.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: RGACX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.01 vs. WPCSX (-8.81). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.85 vs. WPCSX (8.33).
| RGACX | WPCSX | RGACX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.75 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.75 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.655 | 6.092 | 290% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 717M | 46,862% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.01 | -8.81 | -125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.57 | 26.95 | 262% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.85 | 8.33 | 454% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.78 | 74.33 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement