Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WPCSX
RGACX vs WPCSX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WPCSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$76.64
Change-$9.33 (-10.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
AB Concentrated Growth C
Price$42.65
Change-$7.14 (-14.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets636.79M
RGACX vs WPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WPCSX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and WPCSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. WPCSX (637M). RGACX (0.00) and WPCSX (0.00) have matching dividends . RGACX was incepted earlier than WPCSX: RGACX (24 years) vs WPCSX (12 years). WPCSX (1.75) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. WPCSX (18.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPCSX: RGACX (250) vs WPCSX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.06 vs. WPCSX (-9.54). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 11.01 vs. WPCSX (-11.92).
| RGACX | WPCSX | RGACX / WPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.75 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.75 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.046 | -2.936 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 637M | 52,747% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.06 | -9.54 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.58 | -0.65 | -6,528% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.01 | -11.92 | -92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.97 | 82.03 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers