Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WFOPX
RGACX vs WFOPX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WFOPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.05
Change-$1.88 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
Allspring Opportunity C
Price$44.80
Change-$0.76 (-1.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.86B
RGACX vs WFOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WFOPX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and WFOPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. WFOPX (1.86B). RGACX pays higher dividends than WFOPX: RGACX (0.07) vs WFOPX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than WFOPX: RGACX (24 years) vs WFOPX (18 years). WFOPX (1.94) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WFOPX (20.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFOPX: RGACX (250) vs WFOPX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.31 vs. WFOPX (-6.91). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.90 vs. WFOPX (-1.24).
| RGACX | WFOPX | RGACX / WFOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.92 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.94 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.364 | 5.757 | 336% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 1.86B | 18,319% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.31 | -6.91 | -120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.31 | 13.16 | 481% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.90 | -1.24 | -3,068% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.36 | 5.30 | 1,857% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement