Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs WFOPX
RGACX vs WFOPX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs WFOPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.70
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.91B
Allspring Opportunity C
Price$45.07
Change+$0.15 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.88B
RGACX vs WFOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. WFOPX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Hold and WFOPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. WFOPX (1.88B). RGACX pays higher dividends than WFOPX: RGACX (0.07) vs WFOPX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than WFOPX: RGACX (23 years) vs WFOPX (18 years). WFOPX (1.94) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WFOPX (20.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFOPX: RGACX (250) vs WFOPX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.01 vs. WFOPX (-5.26). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.85 vs. WFOPX (1.95).
| RGACX | WFOPX | RGACX / WFOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.92 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.94 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.655 | 4.619 | 382% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 1.88B | 17,906% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.01 | -5.26 | -209% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.57 | 19.68 | 359% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.85 | 1.95 | 1,946% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.78 | 2.96 | 3,272% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement